Christmas: How a Golden Calf Became a Green Tree and a Sacred Cow
(Revelation 11:10) And they that dwell upon the earth shall rejoice over them, and make merry, and shall send gifts one to another; because these two prophets tormented them that dwelt on the earth. The Book of Revelation is rich with intriguing figures that have profound spiritual significance. In the eleventh chapter are described two powerful witnesses of God whose testimony serves as a torment to men. There has been much speculation as to the identity of these two witnesses and some have suggested that they are not men but rather are God's church and God's word: two witnesses of Himself which He left in the earth. Whoever these witnesses are, they stand as a torment to men until their testimony is finished and then men default to carnal rejoicing, making merry and exchanging gifts. This is a curious figure indeed---one of which the spiritually-minded should take note, and one which serves as a very provocative springboard for an article against Christmas: a festive time of rejoicing, making merry and exchanging gifts that flourishes in the absence of the testimony of God. Boldfacing of portions of Scripture has been added for emphasis in this essay. It comes as a shock to many that some Christians do not participate in Christmas celebrations and traditions. One of the first assumptions usually made is that such Christians are either not Christians at all or are part of some cult movement. As for us, we do not celebrate Christmas because of what Holy Scripture teaches about such a custom. We are convinced that we have God's infallible word delivered to us as the King James Version of the Bible (KJV) and would hope that others believe they have God's infallible word also. As such, we also hope that readers of this article would do as the noble Bereans, who “...searched the Scriptures daily, whether those things were so...” (ACT 17:11). This article also mentions certain secular observations about the Christmas custom which the noble reader can readily check out for himself since the information is voluminous and readily available and thus he can be diligent to “prove all things...” (1TH 5:21). As familiar as the Christmas custom is in America today, such was not always the case. Until the early to middle part of the 19th century, Christmas was not even officially recognized as a civic holiday. On the contrary, Christmas was generally looked upon as a superstitious holiday to be avoided, it having no place in a society founded on Christian principles as laid down in the KJV Bible. In 1851, a Cleveland minister is supposed to have nearly lost his job because he brought a Christmas evergreen tree into the church building. As late as 1870, public schools in Boston remained open on Christmas Day and apparently expelled students who stayed home. In the infancy of this country laws were even on the books which imposed fines and/or imprisonment should one be found observing the Christmas celebration. One such law in Massachusetts read: “Whosoever shall be found observing any such day as Christmas or the like, either by forbearing of labor, feasting, or in any other way.....shall be subject to a fine of five shillings.” (Compton's Pictured Ency.) We do not advocate that religious worship should be thus ordered by civil authority but rather by persuasion of conscience. However, one might pause to ask whether America is more biblically oriented today than it was back then, or is it the other way around? In earlier times, various Protestant denominations and many Baptists refused to recognize Christmas for biblical reasons similar to those which are to follow in this essay. It is the endeavor of our church, by the grace of God, to not be conformed to the world (ROM 12:1-2) but to His word and honor the instructions for service and worship therein. We affirm that the word of God is the standard whereby we judge all things, especially our faith and practice. We also stand, even desire, to be corrected if error can be proven with the Scripture. Those who don't believe they have an infallible Bible or have no intention of being regulated by such may want to stop reading here. It is commonly believed that God is equally pleased with various forms of worship---that all religions are equally valid. But this is not the position of the God of the Bible. Observe His words concerning worship: (John 4:23-24) But the hour cometh, and now is, when the true worshippers shall worship the Father in spirit and in truth: for the Father seeketh such to worship him. God is a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth. The Savior tells us plainly that there is a specific, exclusive form of worship that God is seeking. Worshipping Him in spirit and in truth is not an option to be set aside in favor of something else---we MUST so worship. Since God's word is truth (JOH 17:17), Jesus is obviously calling men to worship Him according to the Scripture. He later commissioned His apostles to go into all the world: (Matthew 28:20) Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world. Amen. Again, notice the directive for men is not to observe whatever they think is right but rather the things which He has commanded. He later inspired the Apostle Paul to write these words to the church at Corinth: (I Corinthians 11:1-2) Be ye followers of me, even as I also am of Christ. Now I praise you, brethren, that ye remember me in all things, and keep the ordinances, as I delivered them to you. It is evident here again that the ordinances of God's religion are to be kept AS DELIVERED. But what, one might wonder, does this have to do with Christmas? It is painfully clear that a significant amount of activity that attends Christmas is conspicuously absent from the Bible, let alone there being no Scriptural command or example for even observing the birthday of Jesus Christ as a “holiday.” Where did all these customs come from and what does God have to say concerning them? The bulk of Christmas festivities are long-held traditions of men. And herein lies a problem. It may be stated virtually as a canon that where the ideas and traditions of men are exalted in religion, the effect of the word of God decreases proportionately. The Lord Jesus Christ put it thus to the Scribes and Pharisees: (Mark 7:13) Making the word of God of none effect through your tradition, which ye have delivered.... God has given us commandments and sound principles in His word which ought to govern our religion. Some of these are plainly expressed in the Old Testament scriptures and deserve our attention since we are told this in the New Testament: (II Timothy 3:16) All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: (I Corinthians 10:11) Now all these things happened unto them for ensamples: and they are written for our admonition, upon whom the ends of the world are come. This should not be construed to imply that N.T. Christians are bound by all of the O.T. laws and ordinances but it is good reason to examine the mind of the Lord as revealed there, since all Scripture is profitable. As we intend to demonstrate, some of the principles that God instituted for the people of Israel are still in effect today. Please observe His command for that people regarding the keeping of His religion: (Deuteronomy 12:29-32) When the LORD thy God shall cut off the nations from before thee, whither thou goest to possess them, and thou succeedest them, and dwellest in their land; Take heed to thyself that thou be not snared by following them, after that they be destroyed from before thee; and that thou inquire not after their gods, saying, how did these nations serve their gods? Even so will I do likewise. Thou shalt not do so unto the LORD thy God for every abomination to the LORD, which he hateth, have they done unto their gods; for even their sons and their daughters they have burnt in the fire to their gods. What thing soever I command you, observe to do it: thou shalt not add thereto, nor diminish from it. Competitive religion was something to which Israel would be exposed and God specifically warned them to NOT imitate or incorporate the practices of the pagans into His service but rather avoid them. This is in keeping with the verses which have already been cited, and no less an order exists for N.T. Christians. They likewise are to be separated from other religions and their practices: (II Corinthians 6:14-18) Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion hath light with darkness? And what concord hath Christ with Belial? or what part hath he that believeth with an infidel? And what agreement hath the temple of God with idols? for ye are the temple of the living God; as God hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people. Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing; and I will receive you, And will be a Father unto you, and ye shall be my sons and daughters, saith the Lord Almighty. Men who are not willingly ignorant know there is a God and that He ought to be somehow served and worshipped. But Scripture makes clear that unless that religion is in conformity to God's desires, it is not acceptable to Him. This is why there is such a pressing need for the knowledge of His will as revealed in His word. In God's holy word, He tells people how He wants to be approached in service and worship. For many centuries prior to the coming of the Lord Jesus Christ, humanity consisted of Jews (Israel) and Gentiles (anybody else). God then dealt with the nation of Israel in a fashion that no other nation knew. He gave them His laws, religion and most importantly, His written word. Observe these verses which show how that people was blessed: (Romans 9:4) Who are Israelites; to whom pertaineth the adoption, and the glory, and the covenants, and the giving of the law, and the service of God, and the promises; (Romans 3:1-2) What advantage then hath the Jew? or what profit is there of circumcision? Much every way: chiefly, because that unto them were committed the oracles of God. (Psalms 147:19-20) He sheweth his word unto Jacob, his statutes and his judgments unto Israel. He hath not dealt so with any nation: and as for his judgments, they have not known them. Praise ye the LORD. The Gentile nations of old were obviously religious but they lacked the scriptures where God's will concerning His worship was revealed. What then was the nature of their worship, even though they may have had good intentions? How did God view their religions? Prepare yourself for a shock!: (1 Corinthians 10:20) But I say, that the things which the Gentiles sacrifice, they sacrifice to devils and not to God: and I would not that ye should have fellowship with devils. This does not mean that everyone who is not worshipping God in Spirit and in truth is a child of the devil and on the way to hell. But it is evident that imaginative, unscriptural (though well-intended) religious effort is not glorifying God but Satan. King David approached God by his own means instead of serving Him “...after the due order” (see 1CH 13:1-4 & 1CH 15:12-13), and in so doing invited God's judgment. Aaron's priestly sons offered “...strange fire before the LORD, which he commanded them not” (LEV 10:1-2), and God answered their efforts by killing them with fire. The N.T. Corinthian saints dishonored Christ by the unscriptural manner in which they kept the Lord's Table and Paul had to write, “For this cause many are weak and sickly among you, and many sleep” (1CO 11:30). To a Samaritan woman whose people worshipped in a manner contrary to God's revealed order, Jesus Christ said, “Ye worship ye know not what....” (JOH 4:22). There are other examples in the Bible of children of God who were errantly trying to worship Him by doing it “their way.” We will consider an eminent example of this momentarily. From where, then, comes the custom of Christmas as celebrated today amongst professing Christians? There is some disagreement as to the precise time of this wedding of flesh and spirit, but a general consensus is that it was a 4th Century invention. We could cite many sources both religious and secular but this one from World Book Encyclopedia is typical: “In A.D. 354, Pope Liberius of Rome ordered the people to celebrate on December 25. He probably chose this date because the people of Rome already observed it as the Feast of Saturn, celebrating the birthday of the sun. Christians honoured Christ, instead of Saturn, as the light of the world.” What happened here? People looked to the ways of the heathen and incorporated them into the religion of God. But remember the command: “Thou shalt NOT do so unto the Lord thy God...” (DEU 12:31). Later scholarly research indicates that the December 25 date had been previously chosen by Emperor Aurelian in A.D. 274 as the Feast of Sol Invictus (Feast of the Invincible Sun), otherwise called Dies Natilis Sol Invictus (Birthday of the Invincible Sun) to elevate his preferred cult of a sun-god, Sol. The Feast of Saturn (Saturnalia) began on December 17 and ran into the Feast of Sol Invictus. During Saturnalia, societal norms were altered, many social restraints eased and gift-giving was popularized. The religious festivals of the pagans tended to be very sensual, attended by gross lasciviousness, lusts, drunkenness, revellings and banquetings: ungodly adjuncts of idolatry from which Christians are to abstain: (1 Peter 4:3) For the time past of our life may suffice us to have wrought the will of the Gentiles, when we walked in lasciviousness, lusts, excess of wine, revellings, banquetings, and abominable idolatries: These adjuncts, sadly, are quite typical of the modern winter festival kept in the name of Christ. Scripture points to the commonly acknowledged fact that all pagan religion ultimately is sun-worship. The great mystery is Life and as man without God's written revelation tries to worship the source of life, he finds that all material life depends upon the sun. Thus, the sun was a thing to be adored and worshipped as the fecundating (fertilizing) generative power of nature, and the elements of pagan religion represented and imitated that generative power. It is no secret that practitioners of pagan religions acted out this generative solar intercourse with earth: they were not uncommonly sex cults. Isaiah 14:12-14 shows that Satan's desire is to imitate God, that he would be “like the most High.” Thus, it is not surprising to find an important pagan celebration honoring the devil (remember 1CO 10:20) observed by the ignorant Gentiles (ACT 17:29-30) at the time of the winter solstice to entice the sun's return to fructify the earth for another year. In northern latitudes around December 22 (the shortest daylight period of the year), the sun's influence is at its least. But curiously, three days later (the 25th on our calendar) they acknowledged that he was “resurrected” to renew the eternal cycle of life again. In some cultures this was symbolized by the burning of a yule log on the eve of the “resurrection.” The consumed yule log was then seen the next morning in the form of an evergreen tree in the home. There seems to be a perverse counterfeit here: a god “resurrected” after three days and three nights in a devilish imitation of Jesus Christ's entombment and resurrection: (Matthew 12:40) For as Jonas was three days and three nights in the whale's belly; so shall the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth. So when was the true Savior born? THE BIBLE DOES NOT SPECIFICALLY SAY! Given men's propensity to enshrine and idolize things, God wisely obscured the precise date of Jesus' birth even as He once hid the body of Moses (DEU 34:5-6). There is some evidence in Scripture which points to an autumn birth by calculating the courses of the priesthood (LUK 1:5 c/w 1CH 24:1-19) but the accuracy of this is limited. The December 25th date is questionable because at the time of His birth we are told there were “...shepherds abiding in the field, keeping watch over their flock by night” (LUK 2:8) and it is unlikely that shepherds did this in winter even in that Mediterranean region since the nights could be quite cold there and winter was the rainy season: (Song of Solomon 2:11) For, lo, the winter is past, the rain is over and gone; Even the Savior told His disciples to pray that their flight from Jerusalem's coming destruction would be at a more accommodating time of year: (Mark 13:18) And pray ye that your flight be not in the winter. One of the most common elements of Christmas custom is the evergreen tree which is deemed to represent God's eternality. Tradition holds that Martin Luther introduced this concept to German Christianity around 1500 A.D. But God has expressly denounced the use of ANY image to represent Him or as an aid to worshipping Him: (Deuteronomy 4:15-19) Take ye therefore good heed unto yourselves; for ye saw no manner of similitude on the day that the LORD spake unto you in Horeb out of the midst of the fire: Lest ye corrupt yourselves, and make you a graven image, the similitude of any figure, the likeness of male or female, The likeness of any beast that is on the earth, the likeness of any winged fowl that flieth in the air, The likeness of any thing that creepeth on the ground, the likeness of any fish that is in the waters beneath the earth: And lest thou lift up thine eyes unto heaven, and when thou seest the sun, and the moon, and the stars, even all the host of heaven, shouldest be driven to worship them, and serve them, which the LORD thy God hath divided unto all nations under the whole heaven. God knew the corrupting nature of imagery and therefore gave this warning against what is elsewhere called idolatry. On the one occasion when God allowed Israel to have an image to look upon (Moses' brass serpent, NUM 21:8), it eventually became an idol which had to be destroyed (2KI 18:4). But one might say, “All of this was in the O.T.” True, but idolatry is forbidden in the N.T. as well (1CO 10:14; 1JO 5:21; ACT 15:19-20 et. al.). Accounts like the brass serpent are expressly said to be, as noted earlier, “...for ensamples...written for our admonition...” (1CO 10:11) that the N.T. believer who thinks he can trifle with images with impunity might “...take heed lest he fall” (1CO 10:12). Here are a few verses which show that green trees were a common element of pagan worship: DEU 12:2; 1KI 14:23; 2KI 16:4; 2KI 17:10; 2CH 28:4; ISA 57:5; JER 2:20; JER 3:6, JER 3:13; JER 17:2; EZE 6:13. Scripture also affirms that decorated trees had been used by pagans in their service to their gods long before Jesus Christ's birth or Martin Luther's reasonings: (Jeremiah 10:2-4) Thus saith the LORD, learn not the way of the heathen, and be not dismayed at the signs of heaven; for the heathen are dismayed at them. For the customs of the people are vain: for one cutteth a tree out of the forest, the work of the hands of the workman, with the axe. They deck it with silver and with gold; they fasten it with nails and with hammers, that it move not. The Hebrew word here translated “deck” is a primitive root which means “to be bright” and speaks of beautification or as is appropriately denoted here by “deck” — decoration. A popular Christmas song says, “Deck the halls with boughs of holly...” What Jeremiah described sounds very much like what is commonly done by well-meaning people with an evergreen tree at Christmas. Some have tried to evade the obvious implications of this text by suggesting that Jeremiah was only warning against the manufacturing of an idol of wood from a tree trunk. But whether a tree be denuded, carved and gilded or left in a natural evergreen state and decorated is a false distinction. The concept of representing God by an image is what is condemned. And, it is a historical fact that Pagan Rome and some northern cultures used fir trees as part of their winter festival celebrating their idol god’s death and rebirth. But one might say, “We're not pagans, we're doing this to the LORD.” This would be a good time to consider a very interesting Scripture where we see a great man of God (Aaron, God's chosen High Priest to the nation of Israel) thinking the same way. At the time, Moses had been up on Mt. Sinai receiving the stone tables of holy commandments from God. God told him to get back down to the camp because the people had corrupted themselves and persuaded Aaron to fashion an idol (the golden calf) as part of a worship celebration. But were they intending to only worship a false god? No! Observe: (Exodus 32:5-6) And when Aaron saw it, he built an altar before it; and Aaron made proclamation, and said, Tomorrow is a feast to the LORD. And they rose up early on the morrow, and offered burnt offerings, and brought peace offerings; and the people sat down to eat and to drink, and rose up to play. Notice that 'LORD' is capitalized, which in the KJV Bible means 'Jehovah-God'. They were intending to worship the true God. They had taken an image from pagan culture and adapted it to the worship of the true God, thinking that it would be acceptable to Him. It certainly was not, as the death of three thousand men in the rest of the chapter clearly proves. One might not see any basic difference between this and what a lot of well-intentioned people do with an evergreen tree in December. Neither do we, which is one reason we are persuaded to not do it. How many churches would even give passing consideration to the placing of a golden calf in their houses of worship, hanging a wreath around its neck, draping multi-colored lights on it and saying that this was all to the glory of God? None that we know of, and yet in Scripture the evergreen tree of fertility is no less condemned as an element of superstitious idolatry than the golden calf. And, “what agreement hath the temple of God with idols…?” (2CO 6:16). Are we still under such a censure? Let us read the words of Jesus Christ as given to the Apostle Paul, referring to the “golden calf” incident at the base of Mt. Sinai (he cites from EXO 32:5-6 to make his case): (I Corinthians 10:5-7) But with many of them God was not well pleased: for they were overthrown in the wilderness. Now these things were our examples, to the intent we should not lust after evil things, as they also lusted. Neither be ye idolaters, as were some of them; as it is written, The people sat down to eat and drink, and rose up to play. What Aaron and Israel had done was irrefutably called IDOLATRY and obviously N.T. believers are not to pattern their belief and practice after such errors. Yet is this not exactly what is done at Christmas-time: using pagan ideas and customs, even green trees, to honor God? Frankly, a Christian celebrating Christmas makes less sense than a Jew celebrating Antiochus Epiphane's profaning of the temple with an idol and sacrificing of pigs. The scandal of this unholy mixture of paganism and Christianity is underscored by the fact that God considers all association with false religion to be spiritual adultery (EXO 34:10-17; LEV 20:1-8; NUM 15:37-41; PSA 106:34-43; JER 3:9; JER 7:9, et al.). Adultery is a horrible, wicked sin in a natural sense (LEV 20:10; NUM 5:11-31; JOB 31:9-12; PRO 6:32-35; GAL 5:19-21); it is no less wicked in a spiritual sense. God is a jealous God Whose name is Jealous (EXO 34:14). His people are to be as chaste virgins espoused unto Him (2CO 11:2). His church is His bride (EPH 5:25 c/w REV 21:2). God burns with jealous rage when His people abandon Him for other gods or presume to “love” Him with the tokens or techniques of other gods (DEU 4:23-25; DEU 12:29-32; DEU 32:16, et al.). When Paul was writing to Corinth about the terrible error of mingling paganism with Christ's religion, he asked, “Do we provoke the Lord to jealousy...?” (1CO 10:22). When it comes to Christmas, the answer is emphatically, “Yes!” The church's Husband expects His bride to love Him alone and to love Him only in the way that He has prescribed (it's called worshipping in spirit and in truth, after the due order, sticking to the scriptures). Imagine how a man would feel if his wife could not make love to him without using the techniques of other lovers. Imagine how he would feel if his wife could not make love to him without stimulating pictures of other men pasted on the headboard of the marriage bed. Was not his comeliness and lovemaking sufficient for her? Would he not be justified in feeling slighted, used and jealous? The analogy is painfully clear: Christians who can't be satisfied with the method of loving God that He has prescribed, Christians who insist on using the tokens or pictures of other gods (for such ARE things like green trees, yule logs, etc.)--- they are like the whorish woman who tells her husband that she can only love him while being stimulated by the techniques and pictures of other lovers. It is spiritual pornography and spiritual adultery. It must also be noted that the New Testament of Jesus Christ has disposed of the keeping of holy days (holidays). Under the relatively dark dispensation of the Old Testament, there were many God-given holy days and attendant feasts. That Law was “...a shadow of good things to come...” (HEB 10:1), a shadow of Jesus Christ, and those whose hearts are merry with rejoicing in Him always (PHIL 3:1-3; PHIL 4:4) need no special feast days because “...he that is of a merry heart hath a continual feast” (PRO 15:15) even though they may be sorrowful (2CO 6:10), poor (HEB 10:34) or in heaviness through manifold temptations (1PE 1:6-8). That Old Testament shadow with all its holydays has been taken away by the death of Jesus Christ under a New Testament, relieving Christians of being held accountable to its peculiar ordinances, including holydays: (Colossians 2:14-17) Blotting out the handwriting of ordinances that was against us, which was contrary to us, and took it out of the way, nailing it to his cross; And having spoiled principalities and powers, he made a shew of them openly, triumphing over them in it. Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holyday, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath days: Which are a shadow of things to come; but the body is of Christ. The churches of Galatia which had been converted out of their Gentile paganism were rebuked by the Apostle Paul for backsliding by mingling their N.T. Christianity with their former customs and special days: (Galatians 4:8-11) Howbeit then, when ye knew not God, ye did service unto them which by nature are no gods. But now, after that ye have known God, or rather are known of God, how turn ye again to the weak and beggarly elements, whereunto ye desire again to be in bondage? Ye observe days, and months, and times, and years. I am afraid of you, lest I have bestowed upon you labour in vain. Sadly, many professing Christians today also like the weak and beggarly elements of holidays, preferring shadows and bondage to substance and liberty simply because it satisfies the flesh, and “...they that are after the flesh do mind the things of the flesh...” (ROM 8:5). The N.T. church does have one appointed feast to observe: the Lord's Table (1CO 10:16-21), a simple, solemn memorial of the sufferings and death of Jesus Christ of which Paul said, “...let us keep the feast...” (1CO 5:5). This feast is not regulated by a lunar calendar, not a sumptuous banquet, not a venue for exchanging gifts: it does not cater to carnal appetites. God never tells us to remember Christ's birth with a seasonal holiday feast but rather to remember Christ's death with this feast---a feast that richly feeds the soul of the spiritually-minded. In objection to all of the above, some might say that such reasoning is cold, hard, or legalistic and out of touch with the principle of Christian liberty in the New Testament. But liberty was never meant to be used as “...an occasion to the flesh...” (GAL 5:13), and it should be remembered that this was fundamentally God’s displeasure with the Corinthian saints: they exploited Christ and their liberty for fleshly delights. How? They had taken the simple religious ordinance that God had given them to commemorate Christ's sufferings (the Lord’s Table) and turned it into a festival which catered to their carnal appetites (1CO 11:20-34), very similar to the way Christmas became the popular custom that it is today. Another objection goes like this: “But Christmas is the one time of the year when an unbelieving world hears about Jesus Christ: it is the best thing ever for evangelizing the unconverted.” If this is a valid objection, does it not seem strange that neither Jesus Christ nor His inspired apostles remembered to instruct believers to celebrate it? Scripture is bereft of any passage that says something to the effect of “Throw Jesus a big birthday party where everybody else gets the gifts at a time of year when He likely wasn't born. Do it by mingling sensual pagan customs and worldly traditions with His simple spiritual religion so as to commercialize the gospel and give everyone, including the ungodly, an excuse to party and feel good about themselves. And make this tradition more precious than God's word itself.” The title of this essay (Christmas: How a Golden Calf Became a Green Tree and a Sacred Cow) is intentionally poignant. The emotional attachment to Christmas is so strong that even many Christians cannot bear the thought of it being challenged. It is to them a proverbial sacred cow and something to be defended with the same illogical zeal as the Ephesian townclerk who was defending the fable of the idol goddess, Diana: “Seeing then that these things cannot be spoken against...” (ACT 19:35-36). Emotion does not equal truth and can be the enemy of faith, even as Jesus' disciples once “...yet believed not for joy...” (LUK 24:41). It should also be noted that the Ephesian pagans had a very simple reason to defend their superstitious imaginations about Diana: “...ye know that by this craft we have our wealth” (ACT 19:24-25). It is no secret that the commercial value of religious holidays is a powerful dynamo driving them and which motivates carnal men to therefore through covetousness with feigned words make merchandise of Christians and the gospel: (2 Peter 2:2-3) And many shall follow their pernicious ways; by reason of whom the way of truth shall be evil spoken of. And through covetousness shall they with feigned words make merchandise of you: whose judgment now of a long time lingereth not, and their damnation slumbereth not. Given the bloody history of Baptists who suffered at the hands of the Roman Catholic church for not recognizing its corrupt inventions (like Christmas), it makes about as much sense for a historic Baptist to celebrate Christmas as it would for a Jew to celebrate the Third Reich's Final Solution. Some, if not all of the things which you have just read may seem unpleasant or difficult. But the way of truth and life was never meant to be easy: (Matthew 7:13-14) Enter ye in at the strait gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction, and many there be which go in thereat: Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it. We might add here that we are certainly not opposed to people having a season of warmth and joy or family togetherness but not by polluting the religion of Jesus Christ. Frankly, we would hope that the positive aspects of this season (joy and praise of God, brotherly love, etc.) would be observed year round instead of confining them to a month-long emotional orgasm. Furthermore, if a person chooses to set aside a specific day to honor the birth of Christ, why do it by draping naked pagan theology with a flimsy negligee of Christian terms or forms? Why not honor Him by living out the very reason that He came to earth: to “...save His people from their sins” (MAT 1:21), sins like idolatry, carnality and unbiblical traditions of men? In other words: set aside “...To day...while it is called To day...” (HEB 3:7-13) to repent, believe the gospel and follow Christ in obedience to His word, striving to worship Him in Spirit and truth without human inventions and especially without the synthesis of pagan customs. And that, dear reader, is some of why we do not celebrate Christ’s birth according to the Christmas custom. May God bless you with an open, receptive, understanding and, if necessary, penitent heart.